Building the Clinical Bridge: An Australian Success

Nursing effectiveness science includes primary, secondary, and translational, clinically focused research activities which aim to improve patient or client outcomes. It is imperative, for the successful conduct of a program of nursing effectiveness science, that a clinical bridge is established between academic and healthcare service facilities. An Australian example of the development of a robust clinical bridge through the use of jointly funded positions at the professorial level is outlined. In addition, an analysis of the practical application of Lewin's model of change management and the contribution of both servant and transformational leadership styles to the bridge building process is provided

The partnering with patients model of nursing interventions : A first step to a practice theory

The development of a body of knowledge, gained through research and theory building, is one hallmark of a profession. This paper presents the “Partnering with Patients Model of Nursing Interventions”, providing direction towards how complex nursing interventions can be developed, tested and subsequently adopted into practice. Coalescence of understanding of patient-centred care, the capabilities approach and the concept of complex healthcare interventions led to the development of the model assumptions and concepts. Application of the model to clinical practice is described, including presentation of a case study, and areas for future research including understanding both patients’ and nurses’ perceptions and experiences when the model is in use, and testing the effect of nursing interventions based on the model are recommende

Nutritional intakes of patients at risk of pressure ulcers in the clinical setting

Objective: Malnutrition is a risk factor for pressure ulcers. The aim of this study was to describe the energy and protein intakes of hospitalized patients at risk for pressure ulcers and to identify predictors of eating inadequately

Reprint of:Patient participation in nursing bedside handover: A systematic mixed-methods review

BACKGROUND: Numerous reviews of nursing handover have been undertaken, but none have focused on the patient's role. OBJECTIVES: To explore how patient participation in nursing shift-to-shift bedside handover can be enacted. DESIGN: Systematic mixed- methods review. DATA SOURCES: Three search strategies were undertaken in July-August 2016: database searching, backwards citation searching and forward citation searching. To be included, papers had to either be research or quality improvement (QI) projects focusing on the patient role. Fifty-four articles were retrieved, including 21 studies and 25 QI projects. REVIEW METHODS: Screening, data extraction and quality appraisal was undertaken systematically by two reviewers. Research studies and QI projects were synthesised separately using thematic synthesis, then the results of this synthesis were combined using a mixed-method synthesis table. RESULTS: Segregated synthesis of research of patients' perceptions revealed two contrasting categories; patient-centred handover and nurse-centred handover. Segregated synthesis of research of nurses' perceptions included three categories: viewing the patient as an information resource; dealing with confidential and sensitive information; and enabling patient participation. The segregated synthesis of QI projects included two categories: nurse barriers to enacting patient participation in bedside handover; and involving patients in beside handover. Once segregated findings were configured, we discovered that the patient's role in bedside handover involves contributing clinical information related to their care or progress, which may influence patient safety. Barriers related to nurses' discomfort encouraging patient participation and worries for sharing confidential and sensitive information. The way nurses approach patients, and how patient-centred they are, constitute further potential barriers. Strategies to improve patient participation in handover include training nurses, making handovers predictable for patients and increasing the interpersonal approach during handover. CONCLUSIONS: Using research and QI projects allowed diverse findings to expand each other and identify gaps between research and heuristic knowledge. Our review showed the tension between standardising handovers and making them predictable for patient participation, while promoting tailored and flexible handovers. Further investigation of this issue is required, to understand how to train nurses to achieve this and prepare patients to do this. Many barriers and strategies identified were from QI projects and the nurse perspective, thus caution interpreting results is required. We recommend steps be taken in the future to ensure high quality QI projects

Caring for the older person with cognitive impairment in hospital: Qualitative analysis of nursing personnel reflections on fall events

Aims and objectives To explore nurse and nursing assistant reflections on the care of older patients with cognitive impairment who have experienced a fall. Background While there are evidence‐based clinical guidelines for the prevention and management of falls and for the care of older people with cognitive impairment, the falls rates for older people with cognitive impairment are three times as high as those without. Design Critical incident technique. Methods Eleven registered and two enrolled nurses and four assistants in nursing working in one subacute and two acute wards within two hospitals of a tertiary level health service in south‐east Queensland. Individual semistructured interviews focused on two past events when a patient with cognitive impairment had fallen in hospital: one when there was minimal harm and the second when there was significant harm. Thematic analysis was undertaken. The COREQ checklist was followed. Results Three themes emerged from 23 reflective accounts of fall events: “direct observation is confounded by multiple observers” and “knowing the person has cognitive impairment is not enough,” and “want to rely on the guideline but unsure how to enact it.” While participants were aware of the falls prevention policy and techniques available to prevent falls, the implementation of these was challenging due to the complexity of care required by the older person with cognitive impairment. Conclusions Falls prevention for older people with cognitive impairment is complex and belies the simple application of policy. Relevance to clinical practice To reduce falls, nurses can involve the family to support “knowing the patient” to enable prediction of impulsive actions; shift the focus of in‐service from lectures to specific case presentations, with collaborative analysis on person‐focused strategies to prevent falls in older people with cognitive impairment; and reconsider the sitter role from simple observer to assistant, focused on ambulation and supporting independence in activities of daily living.Full Tex

Implementation of an evidence-based practice nursing handover tool in intensive care using the knowledge-to-action framework

Background Miscommunication during handover has been linked to adverse patient events and is an international patient safety priority. Despite the development of handover resources, s tandardised handover tools for nursing team leader s in intensive care are limited. Aims The study aim was to implement and evaluate an evidence- based electronic minimum dataset for nursing team leader shift -to-shift handover in the intensive care unit using the k nowledge- to-action framework. Methods This study was conducted in a 21- bed medical/surgical intensive care unit in Queensland, Australia. Senior registered nurses involved in team leader handover were recruited. Three phases of the knowledge- to-action framework (select, tailor and implement interventions, monitor knowledge use and evaluate outcomes ) guided the implementation and evaluation process. A post -implementation practice audit and survey were carried out to determine nursing team leader use and perceptions of the electronic minimum dataset three months after implementation. Results are presented using descriptive statistics ( median, IQR, frequency and percentage) . Results Overall (86%, n=49) , team leader s used the electronic minimum dataset for handover and communication regarding patient plan increased . K ey content items however were absent from handovers and additional documentation was required alongside the minimum dataset to conduct handover. Of the team leader s surveyed (n=35), those receiving handover perceived the electronic minimum dataset more Page 4 of 24 positive ly than team leader s giving handover (n=35) . Benefits to using the electronic minimum dataset included the pat ient content (48%), suitability for short -stay patients (16%), decreased time updating (12%) and print ing the tool (12%) . Almost half of the participants however, found the minimum dataset contained irrelevant information, reported difficulties navigating and locating relevant information and pertinent information was missing. Suggestions for improvement focused on modifications to the electronic handover interface. Linking evidence to action Prior to developing and implementing electronic handover tools , adequate infrastructure is required to support knowledge translation and ensure clinician and organisational needs are met

Patients' perceptions of a pressure ulcer prevention care bundle in hospital : A qualitative descriptive study to guide evidence-based practice

Background: Pressure ulcers place a significant burden on patients and hospitals. Our team developed and tested a pressure ulcer prevention care bundle (PUPCB) in a cluster randomized trial. As part of the process evaluation conducted alongside the trial, we explored patients’ perceptions of the intervention. Aims: To identify patients’ perceptions and experiences of a PUPCB in hospital. Methods: This qualitative descriptive study explored the perceptions of a subset of patients who participated in a trial testing the PUPCB across four intervention hospitals. A trained interviewer conducted semistructured interviews, which were digitally recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis. Findings: Nineteen patients were interviewed across the four hospitals. Three main themes emerged: (a) importance of personal contact in PUPCB delivery; (b) understanding pressure ulcer prevention (PUP) enhances participation; and (c) individual factors impact patients’ engagement in PUP. Discussion: The extent to which patients adopted the intervention appeared to be influenced by the complexity of education materials, compatibility with patients’ existing knowledge and beliefs, and perceived advantage of the intervention; ability for human interaction; and patient-related facilitators and barriers to participating in PUP care. Linking Evidence to Action: This study found patients accepted a PUPCB that encouraged participation in care, particularly as it involved personal and positive interactions with nurses and provision of information that was easy to understand and resonated with patients

Patients prefer clinical handover at the bedside; Nurses do not: Evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment

Background: Shift-to-shift bedside handover is advocated as a patient-centred approach, yet its enactment is challenging. Objectives: To describe and compare the preferences of both patients and nurses in the implementation of bedside handover in a Swedish University Hospital. Design: A discrete choice experiment (DCE) survey. Settings: University setting, four medical wards in two hospitals. Participants: Adult medical patients (n = 218) and registered nurses (n = 101) Methods: The survey was administered by an electronic tablet-assisted face-to-face survey. Respondents made repeated choices between two hypothetical bedside handover alternatives and a third alternative of ‘handover away from the bedside’. Handover alternatives were described according to six attributes: invitation to participate, number of nurses present at the handover, family member, carer or trusted friend (of the patient) allowed to be present, level of (patient) involvement, what information related to your (patient) care is discussed. Choice data were analyzed using a mixed logit model. Results: A total of 1308 (patients) and 909 (nurses) choice observations were included in the preference models. Patients showed a strong preference for handover at the bedside compared to nurses. Nurses generally preferred handover away from the bedside. Patients perceived their level of involvement in handover as highly important, being able to speak, hear what was said being the most important characteristic, closely followed by being invited to participate and asked questions as well as being heard. Nurses considered patients being invited to participate most important, followed by level of involvement. Different options for handing over sensitive information were not perceived of importance by patients or nurses. There was substantial variation at the individual level across both patients and nurses for where and how handover is delivered. Conclusions: In this study, patients strongly preferred handover at the bedside, while the nurses considered patients to be invited to participate to be the most important preference but generally preferred handover to take place away from the bedside, all else equal. When implementing bedside handover in a Swedish context this must be considered, although participation is a prerequisite for bedside handover. Differences between patients and nurses’ preferences could jeopardize future introduction of bedside handover in Swedish health care, and might explain why bedside handover is still not very common in hospital wards

Patient preferences for participation in patient care and safety activities in hospitals

BackgroundActive patient participation is a patient safety priority for health care. Yet, patients and their preferences are less understood. The aim of the study was to explore hospitalised patients&rsquo; preferences on participation in their care and safety activities in Sweden.MethodsExploratory qualitative study. Data were collected over a four-month period in 2013 and 2014. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 patients who were admitted to one of four medical wards at a university hospital in Sweden. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.ResultsNine men and eleven women, whose median age was 72 years (range 22&ndash;89), were included in the study. Five themes emerged with the thematic analysis: endorsing participation; understanding enables participation; enacting patient safety by participation; impediments to participation; and the significance of participation. This study demonstrated that patients wanted to be active participants in their care and safety activities by having a voice and being a part of the decision-making process, sharing information and possessing knowledge about their conditions. These factors were all enablers for patient participation. However, a number of barriers hampered participation, such as power imbalances, lack of patient acuity and patient uncertainty. Patients&rsquo; participation in care and patient safety activities seemed to determine whether patients were feeling safe or ignored.ConclusionThis study contributes to the existing literature with fundamental evidence of patients&rsquo; willingness to participate in care and safety activities. Promoting patient participation begins by understanding the patients&rsquo; unique preferences and needs for care, establishing a good relationship and paying attention to each patient&rsquo;s ability to participate despite their illness.<br /